Beyond the Benchmark: Uncovering Additional Value in RFPs
When conducting three- to five-year live-bids, it can be tempting to hyper-focus on fees. After all, benchmarking is often a primary reason for performing an RFP — and maintaining reasonable fees is a core fiduciary duty of plan sponsors. But a thorough review of qualitative measures can be key to getting more of your organizational needs met. Here are some considerations to keep in mind when assembling — and evaluating — your next RFP.
Data security systems and privacy protections. Make sure bidders can cite not only cybersecurity measures, such as remote server backups and password-protected computers, but also physical security such as locking file cabinets, on-site shredding and maintaining signed employee confidentiality agreements on file. Ask whether they’ve received a SOC 2 certification, showing they've met the standard guidelines necessary for the Trust Services Criteria requirement of security as defined by the American Institute of CPAs.
Plans for introducing SECURE 2.0 provisions. Make sure the provider has given careful consideration to the new law and how it might affect your particular plan. How will they help educate participants about SECURE 2.0 and its impact on their retirement planning? What materials, educational resources and tools would they provide?
Direct experience dealing with regulatory agencies. Does the firm employ ERISA attorneys? What additional resources are available to assist with compliance issues? Evaluate the depth and breadth of their experience and their success rate in dealing with regulatory audits or inquiries. The ability to navigate complex regulatory landscapes can be a key differentiator among bidders.
Insurance coverage. Does the provider maintain professional liability insurance, errors and omissions or a fidelity bond? For each, ask for the name of the insurer and details about policy limits to ensure coverage is proportionate to the assets managed.
Experience with similar plans. Determine what expertise they bring to the table that's specific to your plan type and size. It may also be helpful to obtain — and contact — client references. Understanding the bidder’s historical performance and success with similar plans can yield crucial insights into the effectiveness of their strategies and processes.
Client support, service and communication. Assess the provider's communication style and how they plan to collaborate with key stakeholders to achieve plan objectives. Inquire about communication frequency and preferred channels, as well as the firm’s approach to sharing industry insights, regulatory updates, or best practices that may impact your retirement plan.
Is That Your Final Answer? One last overall qualitative “metric” not to overlook is simply how well the bidder addressed all your questions. Did they follow instructions and provide sufficient detail for you to evaluate? Paying sufficient attention to both cost and quality concerns can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of how your organization's specific needs and objectives will be met by a given provider.
Source: https://www.plansponsor.com/what-this-years-rfps-will-look-like/
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
MCF Advisors, LLC (“MCF”) is a SEC registered investment adviser. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. More information about the adviser can also be found by visiting: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/summary/130372. The above commentary is for informational purposes only. Information prepared from third-party sources is believed to be reliable though its accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. MCF may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by MCF), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog/newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog/newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MCF. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MCF is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of this content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of MCF’s current written disclosure statement and customer relationship summary (“Form CRS”) discussing our advisory services and fees continues to remain available upon request. The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. If you are a MCF client, please remember to contact MCF, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.