Provider Consolidation in the Retirement Plan Market: Impacts for Sponsors
Following in the footsteps of many banks and big accounting firms, there’s been a growing trend toward consolidation among retirement plan service providers. But for the most part, less competition hasn’t translated into higher fees for plan sponsors — at least not yet. If anything, the costs for recordkeeping and administrative functions have tended to trend downward.
Moreover, there’s the potential for additional value for sponsors as a result of M&A activity among larger industry players, with the possibility of enhanced resources for clients. For example, plan sponsors may benefit from advanced back-end technology, more robust financial wellness offerings, and improved investment tools.
But the impact of consolidation may also differ depending on the size of your plan, with larger plans potentially having fewer choices available to them. If your service provider has a merger in the works, your advisor can help you navigate uncertain waters and review your agreements to ensure service levels remain consistent. He or she will be familiar with the larger service provider landscape and can help you evaluate the potential impact of any changes should they occur. Networking with other sponsors and communicating directly with your recordkeeper and plan administrator may also help you prepare for what lies ahead in an evolving service provider marketplace.
While it’s advisable to live-benchmark your recordkeeper every three to five years, a potential merger could call for tightening that timeline should any concerns arise. And if increased consolidation continues to result in more favorable plan pricing generally, it may indicate that lower fees — or higher levels of service for similar fees — might be available for your plan elsewhere. Even if your service provider isn’t currently merging with another firm, investigating other options may be beneficial.
A 2021 survey conducted by NAPA to gauge the impact of recordkeeper consolidation on overall service levels found mixed results. Whereas 58% saw comparable service post-merger, 11% reported better or much better service, while 31% said service had deteriorated or reached “OMG bad” levels.
The jury is still out, and sponsors should adopt a wait-and-see approach to determine whether provider consolidation will be a net plus or minus. But even if the overall impact on the retirement plan industry turns out to be positive, a provider’s merger may still create some level of disruption within your organization. That’s why it’s prudent to remain vigilant about any upcoming changes in the marketplace, monitor for continuity of service quality following a merger, keep all lines of communication open and remain prepared to seek out a new provider if necessary. Because in the end, it’s the impact of your provider’s consolidation on your own plan that matters most.
Please contact your MCF Plan Consultant with any questions.
Sources:
https://www.napa-net.org/news-info/daily-news/reader-poll-whats-impact-recordkeeper-consolidation
https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/benefits/Pages/retirement-plan-sponsors-face-a-consolidating-401k-marketplace.aspx
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
MCF Advisors, LLC (“MCF”) is a SEC registered investment adviser. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. More information about the adviser can also be found by visiting: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/. This is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. MCF may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by MCF), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog/newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog/newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MCF. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MCF is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of this content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of MCF’s current written disclosure statement and customer relationship summary (“Form CRS”) discussing our advisory services and fees continues to remain available upon request. The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. If you are a MCF client, please remember to contact MCF, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.