facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
%POST_TITLE% Thumbnail

Waiting for the Bottom to Fall? How the Stock Market Reacts to Presidential Elections

By: Hunter Nighbert, Sr. Financial Advisor

Presidential elections in the U.S. can elicit strong emotions and anxiety for investors and often bring significant attention to the stock market, as investors anticipate how political outcomes might influence economic policies. Historically, market behavior around election time follows certain trends, driven largely by uncertainty and speculation about future policy changes.

Pre-Election Volatility

In the months leading up to the election, the stock market typically experiences increased volatility. This is driven by investor uncertainty regarding potential changes in tax policy, regulation, and government spending. Markets often react to polling data and debates, with swings reflecting which party or candidate is perceived to have an edge. For example, sectors like healthcare, energy, and defense often respond differently based on expectations of a Republican or Democratic win.

In recent election cycles the stock markets generally perform positively in the months leading up to the election, as seen in election years such as 2016 and 2020. However, as the election nears and uncertainty intensifies, volatility can spike, particularly if the outcome is unclear. But this usually gives way to positive returns after the election concludes. 

Post-Election Relief Rally

Once the election outcome is known, markets often experience a "relief rally," where the reduction in uncertainty, regardless of which candidate wins, leads to short-term market gains. This phenomenon occurred in 2016 when Donald Trump’s unexpected victory led to an initial drop in futures markets on election night, followed by a substantial rally in the following weeks. A larger sample size still shows positive returns in election years. According to a July article in the US News and World Report, 1since 1952, the S&P 500 has averaged a 7% gain in election years.

Longer-term trends after an election depend largely on the policies of the new administration. A president introducing stimulus measures or tax cuts can lead to market gains, while policies that increase regulation may cause certain sectors to react negatively. However, it is important to note historically, the stock market has performed well under both Democratic and Republican administrations with no clear correlation to performance based on which party wins the executive branch in any given year. 

As you can see from the below chart2, the historical average return for unified Republican and Democratic administrations are quite similar. The main separation happens when there is a divided government. This analysis is based solely on historical data and doesn’t predict future outcomes.  It highlights the advantages of long-term investing and emphasizes that investment choices shouldn’t hinge on the identity of the next President.

Situation

Number of Years

S&P 500 Index Annual Average Return

Unified Republican

13 years

14.52%

Unified Democrat

36 years

14.01%

Divided with Republican President

34 years

7.33%

Divided with Democratic President

15 years

16.63%








Data from 1926 through 2023. Unified government means that the Presidency, the House of Representatives and the Senate are all controlled by a single party. Divided government means that at least one houses of Congress or the Presidency is controlled by the other party. Indexes are not available for direct investment. For educational purposes only.

While there are no guarantees and past performance does not predict future returns, stock markets tend to follow predictable patterns around elections, with pre-election volatility and post-election stabilization. The actual impact depends on a variety of factors, including economic fundamentals, global events, and the policies pursued by the newly elected administration. 

  1. Dugan, Whayne.  “Election 2024: How Stocks Perform in Election Years” US News and World Report, July 31st, 2024.
  2. Bob French. “Are Republicans or Democrats Better for the Stock Market” Retirement Researcher, https://retirementresearcher.com/are-republicans-or-democrats-better-for-the-stock-market/

Download Article 

Return to Perspectives & News 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 

MCF Advisors, LLC (“MCF”) is a SEC registered investment adviser. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. 

More information about the adviser can also be found by visiting: https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/. This is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. MCF may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by MCF), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog/newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog/newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from MCF. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. MCF is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of this content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of MCF’s current written disclosure statement and customer relationship summary (“Form CRS”) discussing our advisory services and fees continues to remain available upon request. The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. If you are a MCF client, please remember to contact MCF, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services.